They were punished for sexual sin along with the other sins of which they were guilty. Some have suggested that this relates to the fact that the visitors to the city were angelic—Jude references angelic sin earlier in his letter. Their desire was to have sex with the men staying with Lot. In other words, it was the homosexual nature of their desires, and not just the violent expression of them, that is highlighted in the New Testament.
Sometimes people claim that these verses appear in a book of laws that no Christians think we should follow today. Hence, they say, the prohibitions on same-sex sex do not now apply. They therefore suggest these verses do not condemn all homosexual behaviour, but only cultic prostitution connected to pagan temples. In addition, the surrounding verses describe other forms of sexual sin such as incest, adultery and bestiality. These have nothing to do with pagan temples or idolatry, and Christians would recognise that they are still forbidden today.
Furthermore, Leviticus highlights both male parties equally. This also suggests that general, consensual homosexual activity is in view as opposed to rape or a forced relationship. Turning to the New Testament, Romans 1 has much to say about the nature and character of homosexual behaviour. Romans zeroes in on the Gentile world, describing how it has turned away from God and embraced idolatry.
The particular details in the passage may indicate that Paul is using the Greco-Roman culture surrounding his readers as a case in point.
Paul then illustrates how this has happened. He gives three examples of how what has been known about God has been exchanged for something else. They exchange the glory of God for images of creatures verse They exchange the truth of God for a lie, worshipping created things verse In these verses Paul describes different kinds of people who unless they repent will be excluded from the kingdom of God.
Four kinds relate to sexual sin, and two of those specifically to homosexual behaviour. In 1 Corinthians 6 malakoi comes in a list describing general forms of sexual sin, and the context suggests Paul is probably using it in a broad way to refer to the passive partners in homosexual intercourse. The second term Paul uses is arsenokoitai. These two words are used in the Greek translation of Leviticus and , which suggests that Paul is linking back to those two passages.
Arsenokoitai , then, is a general term for male same-sex sex. Its pairing with malakoi indicates that Paul is addressing both the active and passive partners in homosexual sex. These forms of behaviour are not appropriate for the Church of Jesus Christ, precisely because it is not who we are any more.
Clearly, some of the Corinthians had been active homosexuals. They did once live in these ways. But no more. They have been washed, sanctified and justified; forgiven, cleansed from their sins, and set apart for God. They have a new standing and identity before him.
It is possible for someone living a practising gay lifestyle to be made new by God. Temptations and feelings may well linger. That Paul is warning his readers not to revert to their former way of life suggests there is still some desire to do so.
But in Christ we are no longer who we were. Those who have come out of an active gay lifestyle need to understand how to see themselves. Social norms dictated that men be dominant and women passive in most circumstances. Before the midth century, the church grouped sodomy among many sins involving lust , but their penalties for same sex-relations were very lenient if they existed or were enforced at all.
Church councils and penance manuals show little concern over the issue. In the early 12th century, a time of church revival, reform and expansion, prominent priests and monks could write poetry and letters glorifying love and passion — even physical passion — toward those of the same sex and not be censured. Instead, it was civil authorities that eventually took serious interest in prosecuting the offenders.
By the end of the 12th century, the earlier atmosphere of relative tolerance began to change. Governments and the Catholic Church were growing and consolidating greater authority. They increasingly sought to regulate the lives — even private lives — of their subjects. The Third Lateran Council of , a church council held at the Lateran palace in Rome, for example, outlawed sodomy. Clerics who practiced it were either to be defrocked or enter a monastery to perform penance.
Laypeople were more harshly punished with excommunication. It might be mentioned that such hostility grew, not only toward people engaging in same-sex relations but toward other minority groups as well. Jews, Muslims and lepers also faced rising levels of persecution. While church laws and punishments against same-sex acts grew increasingly harsh, they were, at first, only sporadically enforced.
By the 15th century, however, the church conformed to social opinions and became more vocal in condemning and prosecuting homosexual acts , a practice that continues to today.
In order for suffering to be Christ-like, it must be redemptive. Redemptive suffering does not uphold oppressive forces but always expresses resistance against them. While the six passages that address same-sex eroticism in the ancient world are negative about the practices they mention, there is no evidence that these in any way speak to same-sex relationships of love and mutuality.
To the contrary, the amount of cultural, historical and linguistic data surrounding how sexuality in the cultures of the biblical authors operated demonstrates that what was being condemned in the Bible is very different than the committed same-sex partnerships we know and see today. If neither sex differentiation nor gender complementarity are the basis for Christian partnership, then what is? From Genesis 2, to Matthew 19, to Ephesians 5, what these passages make explicit and is echoed throughout the rest of Scripture is something mentioned earlier: marriage is sacred for Christians because it can represent the enduring love between Christ and the Church.
Anyone who has ever been in an intimate relationship of any kind can testify to the range of differences and resulting conflicts that are an inherent part of any two personalities attempting to integrate their lives.
All things considered, it is important to remember that throughout church history, new information about people and the world have frequently led Christians to reconsider their beliefs.
This need not be a reason to distrust Scripture, but rather should serve as an invitation to wrestle with the contexts of the biblical writers and our own lived experiences. Read about what the Bible says about transgender people here. For further reading: Cheryl B. Eerdmans Publishing Co, Matthew Vines.
Eerdmans Publishing Co. By clicking "GO" below, you will be directed to a website operated by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, an independent c 3 entity. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
0コメント