Murder cases, rape, theft and wars are all prime examples of savage behaviour portrayed through violence. This is why I believe humans are capable of being savages in their own lives. Humans receive the capability of becoming savages by the effects of wars, participation of gangs in societies, and humans killing their own species. Initially, savagery is portrayed through the abomination of war.
This is significant, because war makes people act vicious and barbaric while causing mass destruction in countries. War also involves the killing of thousands of people which makes people act savage and gives them the desire to kill and destruct. Moreover, I have also noticed how war makes people become savages in my own experience by watching footage of war, I often feel thrilled, and I feel like adrenaline is pumping through my body as I watch massive machines in the middle of the ocean shooting thousands of rounds at each other.
There's just something about destruction that is appealing. To conclude, it is clear that the horror of war causes humans to act like savages in their own lives. Secondly, gangs can be a cause to being savages These reasons clearly state that although civilization keeps society in order, savagery still has a big impact on civilization today in an overwhelming number of ways.
Cable News Network, 09 Nov. London: Faber and Faber Limited, Get Access. Powerful Essays. Comparing Nature of Man in Island of Dr. Moreau and Lord of the Flies. Read More. Better Essays. Euthanasia Words 4 Pages. Satisfactory Essays. The most likely to fall for this lie are the poor, who can least afford to lose the money they do get from their labors.
Coveting is placing your wants above the rights of your neighbor. In a civilized society, the urge to covet and steal are corrected at around age , and continue to be monitored by parents until a person reaches adulthood; only the uncivilized keep coveting and stealing into adulthood. If these relative few are held accountable—are removed from civilized society until and if their behavior is corrected—then society is safe from the decay.
Observe, for example, taking an oath to tell the truth in a court of law. The oath means that, because God is your witness, and He knows the truth, and you will be judged by Him in this life and the life to come, therefore you feel the requirement to tell the truth under oath.
God is bigger than yourself, a mere human, and He is bigger than your human peers; so it is to God you obligate yourself in the oath, not just to society. But, without any belief greater than your personal self, you your own god could declare that it is acceptable for you to lie if it fits your personal needs to do so. You accept no higher authority to insist otherwise. Society feels no obligation from you, because you admit to nothing greater than yourself and your personal moral code, however self-serving.
I am saying, societally it ought to be up to the non-religious to present evidence that they are being truthful. Maybe that would be submitting to a lie-detector; maybe it would be supplying character witnesses.
Affirming, rather than taking an oath, is already allowed in the Constitution, and there are already laws against purjury. But I would like to see some initiative on the part of the non-religious to compensate the Civilized society for the fact that their belief system gives society less guarantee of their truthfulness. While we must not have a state religion more on freedom of religion later , there is a religious morality that enables laws and freedom to exist and encourage civilization that atheism or secularism fails to do.
In Soviet countries during communist rule, Christian grandmothers persisted in teaching religious values to their children and grandchildren. The Soviets controlled productions. But developers of the European Union have conspired that they will not make the same mistake; they will also control reproduction and education. When you control education of children, you control the destiny of mankind.
No one can be forced to believe something. We can be persuaded, shown overwhelming evidence, encouraged to believe, but we cannot be forced. The problem is, in an oppressive society as most historical societies have been, and many are today we can be forced to appear to believe.
There was an article in the Religion section of the local paper some time ago, in which several different religious leaders were asked what they thought were the most dangerous religious beliefs. One clergyman, from a place where no proselytizing among members of his religion is allowed, said he thought proselytizing was the most dangerous threat.
But a threat to his religion? That is clearly a lot more dangerous to religious people than people who believe they have found a true church or people who share their beliefs. In religious thought there is nothing so dangerous—and illogical—as killing because of religious beliefs.
Oppression is uncivilized. It is the thought of people who want to increase their power over others by eliminating their enemy, and they happen to choose the name of a religion as their excuse for power lust. Wherever you see a religion claiming it has the right to execute people, not even for evil acts but simply for their beliefs, you can be absolutely certain you are not looking at people seeking closeness to God. Likewise, there is no circumstance in which having a state-sponsored religion is actually intended to increase the faith of the people; it is always to eliminate dissent.
The state—the governing entity that the people have ceded power to—has no moral sense in and of itself. So ceding to the state the decision of what religious beliefs to hold is more foolhardy than ceding just about any other personal responsibility related to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That belief can be a civilizing influence and philosophical bond.
But that happens when the members choose the belief, and choose to associate, not because the governmental entity has prescribed it.
At the time of the founding, only the federal government was constitutionally prohibited from establishing a state religion; the separate states were allowed. Several colonies had state religions. Connecticut continued for some time after the founding; Massachusetts continued to levy a religious tax so every man would support a church of his choice.
And it is only in the choosing that religion has power to improve the human heart. In ancient history, it was nearly always the practice of a tyrant taking over a people to force them to bow down and worship whatever idol the tyrant insisted on quite often himself as deity.
Religious uniformity was a unifying dictatorial force. And tyrants claiming religious reasons will use the very same methods for gaining power that atheist tyrants use.
In a number of countries in the world today, it is illegal to say anything against a particular religion with many violent adherents adherents being a relative term, but they describe themselves as believers. But a surprising majority in some countries believe that there are circumstances in which terrorism—purposefully killing innocents in as large numbers as can be accomplished and not as part of a defensive war —is an acceptable practice.
That is mental derangement on a grand scale. There are no such circumstances. Terrorism is a savage act. And it is a tyrannical act; the purpose is to create chaos to persuade the innocent to succumb to the rule of the tyrant.
It is never a civilizing religious act. Its perpetrators cannot have a civilized reason for committing the terrorist act. The only reason is savage desire for tyranny. That terrorism increases in horror is purposeful—to instill greater fear. If there is enough chaotic fear, a sense of danger, that the oppressor can persuade people he is capable of curing, then the oppressor gains power, and that is his goal.
That there are hundreds of millions of people in the world who are willing to accept such horror does not bode well for the planet. It was horrifying to find that the savages recruited suicide bombers, persuading them they were giving their lives in the pursuit of horror. In spring the horror level was raised when these tyrannists recruited two mentally deficient women to be suicide bombers, presumably without their understanding or consent.
And the terrorists did this despicable act on purpose to increase the horror, since the run-of-the-mill suicide bomber no longer causes the same gut-wrenching reaction around the world.
Using the spherical model allows us to see that an act as uncivilized as terrorism against innocents is both savage and tyrannical; the behavior is polar opposite of civilization and freedom. There is no possible outcome for civilization to continue except to prevent, by every means necessary, any terrorist act, and in addition to persuade the world to choose civilization and be willing to sacrifice and fight for it, with absolutely no sympathy for terrorism.
But they must condemn the terrorism—including any rationale the terrorists use to claim it is their right. Many have done so. I hope they find a way to bring forward the civilized sectors and expel the savagery from among them, so that their real religion can do good for society as a whole.
Cleon Skousen summarizes the five necessary tenets of religion in a free society:. There is a Creator who made all things, and mankind should recognize and worship Him. The Creator has revealed a moral code of behavior for happy living which distinguishes right from wrong. The Creator holds mankind responsible for the way they treat each other. All mankind live beyond this life. In the next life mankind are judged for their conduct in this one. These were the basic beliefs of the founders of America.
And these beliefs were nearly universal among the citizens at the time as well. Forty years after the ratification of the Constitution, these are the beliefs that Alexis de Tocqueville described in his Democracy in America.
The republican form of government they established was possible because it was put in place by a basically religious and ethical people. There are correlative beliefs that correspond with savagery. These are:. Degrading the position of God the Creator, often seen as agnosticism or atheism, or more often as replacing deity with a human, as seen in ancient Egypt, Babylon, Greece, and Rome.
The corollary is degrading those who believe in and honor God the Creator. Devaluing human life, often by elevating the value of animals above human life, seen in worship of animals and often leading to human sacrifice to animal gods.
The tendency to degrade believers as unsophisticated or ignorant is common. The insistence that believers are intolerant if they express their beliefs publicly is another indicator of the first rule of the religion of savagery.
When people have their God-given natural right to worship freely taken from them—a hallmark of tyranny—then you can see, by placement on the spherical model, that must be negative for society as a whole. Depending on the intensity of the persecution, society then resides anywhere from just below the freedom zone all the way down into savagery.
The most common occurrence of this repression in the US is insisting that religious symbols and practices be removed from public places. It is simply wrong to say that Jefferson believed religious people should allow only their secular beliefs to be expressed in public.
Jefferson, along with the other founders, valued religion and encouraged its practice in its various civilizing forms, to the betterment of the nation. The distortion from human beings as the sentient caretakers of the earth to evil overlords over the innocent animals is also common in the savage religious belief system.
A further distortion would be claiming we must give up technology that produces the naturally occurring substance carbon-dioxide because using it in the southern US could cause the death of polar bears in the arctic. Likewise the idea that domesticated animals are deprived of their free life is fallacious, because the vast majority of those animals, if undomesticated, would not be living at all.
While it is a mark of civilization to avoid unnecessary cruelty to animals, it is not required of human beings to starve themselves for the sake of preserving other species. No other species chooses such a sacrifice. And no other species has suicidal delusions that the planet would be better off if its species had never been given place here.
Wherever you see human life devalued below animals or parts of nature, you can be certain those beliefs are part of the religion of savagery. Astrology has been around for millennia. He claims, Go out of your heads entirely? An expectation for an average child to develop is under the condition that the child is shown affection and love.
The state a child is raised, will further affect their adult life. The division that occurs between savage and civilized societies is rooted in factors that society views as normal, but when the savages and civilized society mix, it can lead to corrupt morality, negative perception of human beings, and the death of the savage.
A savage society is stereotyped as people who are usually violent, without manners, and animalistic. Civilized society is usually associated with law and order, while savage society is associated with chaos and impulsive decision-making.
They pushed it open and walked into a shuttered twilight. Through an archway on the further side of the room, they could see the bottom of the staircase that led up to the higher floors.
Just under the crown of the arch dangled a pair of feet. John saw things in a more human way, such as wanting meaningful relationships and having a full awareness of his life rather than relying on soma for happiness. He tried to keep his innocence as before, but failed when society became too much for him. He fell into sinful actions, such as taking soma and messing with women.
He tried to rebel against society by running away to a lighthouse. He failed because he let the society corrupt him, which lead to his death. John killing himself was the only way for him to purify his soul from the civilized. Show More. Rhetorical Language In Brave New World Words 4 Pages The connotations of twilight, or the time of day just before the sun fully sets, is an impending gloom or darkness.
Read More.
0コメント